Rugged does not have to mean a brick

Written by on January 20, 2026

The Honor Magic8 Lite is a robust mid-range smartphone that succeeds the Magic7 Lite and serves as the global counterpart to the Honor X70. It combines rugged features such as IP68/IP69K protection, drop resistance from heights of up to 2.5 metres and temperature resistance from −30 to +55 °C with a slim design. The 6.79-inch OLED display impresses with a 120-Hz refresh rate, HDR brightness of up to 6,000 cd/m², 3,840-Hz PWM dimming and good outdoor readability.

The 108-MP main camera delivers solid photos, but the ultra-wide-angle camera and low-light performance fall short. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 paired with 8 GB of RAM ensures decent performance. Wi-Fi is stable but slow, and the speakers tend to distort at maximum volume. The 7,500-mAh battery offers excellent runtimes. Six years of software updates in Europe help round off an otherwise compromise-laden but well-balanced package.

Pros

+ extremely durable

+ long battery runtimes

+ bright and accurate display

Cons

sluggish SoC

slow Wi-Fi

poor ultra-wide-angle camera

The Magic8 Lite can be purchased directly from Honor, but is also available from retailers such as Amazon.

Amazon Logo

$6.87

GUYAHANYER (3-Pack Designed for Honor Magic8 Lite Screen Protector, Anti Scratch 9H+ Tempered Glass Film, HD Easy Installation Bubble Free Screen Protector for Honor Magic8 Lite (6.79″)

  • $8.07

    GUYAHANYER (4-Pack Designed for Honor Magic8 Lite Screen Protector, Anti Scratch 9H+ Tempered Glass Film, HD Easy Installation Bubble Free Screen Protector for Honor Magic8 Lite (6.79″)

  • $5.67

    GUYAHANYER (2-Pack Designed for Honor Magic8 Lite Screen Protector, Anti Scratch 9H+ Tempered Glass Film, HD Easy Installation Bubble Free Screen Protector for Honor Magic8 Lite (6.79″)

The Honor Magic8 Lite succeeds the Magic7 Lite and serves as the global counterpart to the Honor X70, which was unveiled in China in July 2025. As with other Honor smartphones, it comes with a smaller battery outside China (8,300 mAh in the Chinese model) and slower charging speeds, while wireless charging is also absent.

Display

6.79 inch 19.8:9, 2640 x 1200 pixel 427 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, OLED, 3,840-Hz PWM dimming, aluminosilicate glass, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB 

, 485.24 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, compass, gyro, proximity, OTG, IR-Blaster

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41), 5G Sub-6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.76 x 161.9 x 76.1 ( = 0.31 x 6.37 x 3 in)

Battery

7500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, two cells, silicon-carbon anode

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.75, 24 mm) + 5 MP (ultra-wide, f/2.2, 17 mm); Camera2 API level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.45, 24 mm)

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, MagicOS 9.0, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth audio codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM: Widevine L1 | SIM: up to 2× Nano-SIM, up to 1× eSIM, Wi-Fi Calling, VoLTE, Vo5G | Protection: IP68 / IP69K | Maximum charging speed: 66 W (wired), fanless, ruggedized, waterproof

Weight

189 g ( = 6.67 oz / 0.42 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

The Honor Magic8 Lite offers specifications typically associated with a rugged smartphone. It is certified to IP68 and IP69K standards, making it dust- and water-resistant, capable of withstanding high-pressure water jets and hot water vapour. It also survives drops from heights of up to 2.5 metres and operates without restrictions in temperatures ranging from −30 °C to +55 °C. Visually, however, it does not resemble a brick-like rugged phone, instead looking like a conventional smartphone.

Build quality is generally convincing, although the handset creaks noticeably when subjected to torsion. In drop tests, however, it emerges unscathed.

The Magic8 Lite is available with either 256 GB or 512 GB of internal storage.

On paper, the Honor Magic8 Lite supports Wi-Fi 6, but in practice this proves to be comparatively slow in our review and closer to Wi-Fi ac performance levels. Transmission rates are at least stable. All key mobile network frequencies are supported, although overall band coverage is not particularly extensive.

Call quality on the Magic8 Lite is good when the device is held to the ear, but background noise suppression is only moderate.

The capacitive touchscreen responds reliably and integrates an optical fingerprint sensor, which delivers high recognition rates and unlocks the smartphone quickly. In addition, a less secure face unlock feature via the front-facing camera is available. One-handed operation, comprehensive gesture controls and an always-on display are also on board. The vibration motor is subtle and feels like an ERM unit, although Honor does not provide detailed specifications.

Networking
Honor Magic8 Lite
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





500 (min: 483) MBit/s ∼53%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





444 (min: 412) MBit/s ∼48%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





880 (min: 553) MBit/s ∼68%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1562 (min: 1262) MBit/s ∼100%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





951 (min: 922) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





826 (min: 709) MBit/s ∼90%

Google Pixel 9a
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 receive AXE11000





920 (min: 458) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





807 (min: 348) MBit/s ∼88%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





780 (min: 731) MBit/s ∼60%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





833 (min: 789) MBit/s ∼53%

Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000






826 (min: 295) MBit/s ∼87%

iperf3 receive AXE11000






823 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼89%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






1175 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼90%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






1241 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼79%

Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000






706 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼74%

iperf3 receive AXE11000






730 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼79%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






1303 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






1379 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼88%

0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600Tooltip

Honor Magic8 Lite 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø500 (483-511)

Honor Magic8 Lite 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø443 (412-453)

The Honor Magic8 Lite still ships with Android 15 and MagicOS 9.0, but is expected to receive the update to Android 16 along with MagicOS 10 in the near future. Compared to the flagship models, the available AI features are slightly limited.

The outer packaging is free of plastics, but Honor does not provide any specific information on the overall sustainability of the product. In Europe, the Magic8 Lite receives six years of security and version updates, while buyers in the rest of the world are only offered two years.

full resolution]“>Selfie with the Honor Magic8 Lite
Selfie with the Honor Magic8 Lite

The front-facing camera of the Honor Magic8 Lite takes decent photos, but image quality drops fairly quickly in low-light conditions and the results tend to look somewhat over-sharpened. Details are also lost towards the edges of the frame.

The 108-MP main camera on the rear produces pleasing images and offers a usable 2x zoom via cropping. Beyond that, image quality quickly becomes softer, although a maximum zoom factor of 10x is available. The ultra-wide-angle camera delivers only low resolution and poor results overall.

Video recording with the main camera is possible at 4K at 30 fps or 1,080p at 60 fps. On the front, recording is limited to Full HD at 30 fps at best.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide-angle lens5x zoomLow light

orginal image

click to load images

ColorChecker

8.2 ∆E

8.8 ∆E

10 ∆E

10.4 ∆E

8.9 ∆E

8.7 ∆E

5.5 ∆E

7.2 ∆E

9.8 ∆E

7.9 ∆E

8.2 ∆E

7.4 ∆E

7.9 ∆E

9.5 ∆E

10.7 ∆E

5.1 ∆E

9.4 ∆E

11.3 ∆E

4.3 ∆E

3.1 ∆E

7.1 ∆E

7.4 ∆E

4 ∆E

7.2 ∆E

ColorChecker Honor Magic8 Lite: 7.83 ∆E min: 3.05 – max: 11.33 ∆E
ColorChecker

29 ∆E

52.6 ∆E

38.6 ∆E

35.9 ∆E

43.7 ∆E

64.3 ∆E

52.5 ∆E

35.3 ∆E

42.3 ∆E

29 ∆E

64.2 ∆E

62.6 ∆E

31.5 ∆E

47.7 ∆E

36.5 ∆E

75.1 ∆E

42.6 ∆E

41 ∆E

84.1 ∆E

69.2 ∆E

51.1 ∆E

36.5 ∆E

23.8 ∆E

13.3 ∆E

ColorChecker Honor Magic8 Lite: 45.93 ∆E min: 13.35 – max: 84.15 ∆E

The 6.79-inch (17.25 cm) OLED display of the Magic8 Lite delivers a sharp image and supports refresh rates of up to 120 Hz, which can be reduced to 60 Hz either automatically by the system or manually.

Considering its price class, display brightness is very high and reaches up to 6,000 cd/m² in HDR mode. Colour reproduction is well calibrated, and outdoors the panel remains easy to read in most situations.

Honor uses high-frequency PWM dimming at up to 3,840 Hz to make the display easier on the eyes. However, the low base frequency may still pose an issue for sensitive users.

1743
cd/m²
1745
cd/m²
1757
cd/m²
1734
cd/m²
1754
cd/m²
1758
cd/m²
1746
cd/m²
1737
cd/m²
1761
cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1761 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1748.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.64 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1754 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
CCT: 6358 K

Honor Magic8 Lite
OLED, 2640×1200, 6.8″
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
PLS, 2408×1080, 6.6″
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
AMOLED, 2392×1080, 6.8″
Google Pixel 9a
pOLED, 2424×1080, 6.3″
Screen

-136%

-5%

7%

Brightness middle (cd/m²)

1754

495

-72%

1318

-25%

1978

13%

Brightness (cd/m²)

1748

466

-73%

1306

-25%

1775

2%

Brightness Distribution (%)

98

86

-12%

98

0%

76

-22%

Black Level * (cd/m²)

0.58

Colorchecker dE 2000 *

1.5

5.85

-290%

1.5

-0%

1.1

27%

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

3.5

9.78

-179%

2.9

17%

3

14%

Greyscale dE 2000 *

2.4

7

-192%

2.3

4%

2.2

8%

Gamma

2.27 97%

2.231 99%

2.26 97%

2.22 99%

CCT

6358 102%

8691 75%

6819 95%

6622 98%

Contrast (:1)

853

* … smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz
Amplitude: 14.56 %
Secondary Frequency: 3846 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8083 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

       Response Time Black to White
1.07 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.5315 ms rise
↘ 0.5395 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.68 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.281 ms rise
↘ 0.3985 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms).

The Honor Magic8 Lite is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 paired with 8 GB of LPDDR4x RAM. This entry-level SoC delivers solid overall system performance, but no more than that.

Surface temperatures remain largely below 40 °C even under load, rising to a peak of 44.8 °C only in a small area. The SoC itself is unaffected and does not throttle.

The dual speakers provide solid sound output at medium volume, but distort heavily at maximum volume. Bass response is generally weak.

Although the battery is smaller than in the Chinese version, its 7,500 mAh capacity is still very substantial and delivers very good runtimes in our testing. With better efficiency, however, significantly longer runtimes would likely have been possible.

The battery charges at up to 66 watts. In our test, a full charge takes 57 minutes (50% in 19 minutes, 80% in 37 minutes).

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 – 3883, n=215, last 2 years)





1789 Points +61%

Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


1702 Points +53%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288


1179 Points +6%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144


1161 Points +4%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


1112 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (1110 – 1112, n=2)





1111 Points 0%

Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 – 11634, n=215, last 2 years)





5238 Points +68%

Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


4453 Points +43%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144


3351 Points +7%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288


3298 Points +6%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


3124 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (3116 – 3124, n=2)





3120 Points 0%

3DMark
Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144


4229 Points +11%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288


3981 Points +5%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


3808 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (n=1)





3808 Points 0%

Average of class Smartphone
  (270 – 13896, n=97, last 2 years)





2965 Points -22%

Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


Points -100%

Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 – 30621, n=199, last 2 years)





11503 Points +205%

Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


9302 Points +147%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144


4253 Points +13%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288


4176 Points +11%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


3766 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (n=1)





3766 Points 0%

Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 – 8140, n=201, last 2 years)





3037 Points +206%

Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


2615 Points +164%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144


1094 Points +10%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288


1055 Points +6%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


992 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (n=1)





992 Points 0%

Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 – 8102, n=200, last 2 years)





3018 Points +216%

Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


2520 Points +164%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144


1094 Points +15%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288


1060 Points +11%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


955 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (n=1)





955 Points 0%

GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 – 166, n=212, last 2 years)





60.5 fps +89%

Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


60 fps +88%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288


46 fps +44%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


32 fps

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (n=1)





32 fps 0%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144


30 fps -6%

1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 – 367, n=212, last 2 years)





120.9 fps +157%

Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


109 fps +132%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288


52 fps +11%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


47 fps

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (n=1)





47 fps 0%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144


44 fps -6%

on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


59 fps +195%

Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 – 144, n=213, last 2 years)





48.7 fps +144%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288


28 fps +40%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144


22 fps +10%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


20 fps

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (n=1)





20 fps 0%

2560×1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 – 146, n=212, last 2 years)





46.5 fps +158%

Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


39 fps +117%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288


20 fps +11%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


18 fps

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (n=1)





18 fps 0%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144


17 fps -6%

3840×2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 – 62, n=213, last 2 years)





21.6 fps +177%

Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


19 fps +144%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288


8.8 fps +13%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


7.8 fps

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (n=1)





7.8 fps 0%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144


7.6 fps -3%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 – 5210, n=65, last 2 years)





769 Points +256%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


216 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (n=1)





216 Points 0%

Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 – 36297, n=65, last 2 years)





3190 Points +1370%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


217 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (n=1)





217 Points 0%

Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 – 49889, n=65, last 2 years)





4640 Points +824%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


502 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (n=1)





502 Points 0%

CrossMark
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 – 2722, n=123, last 2 years)





1171 Points +57%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288


760 Points +2%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


746 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (n=1)





746 Points 0%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144


689 Points -8%

Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


Points -100%

Productivity
Average of class Smartphone
  (198 – 2317, n=123, last 2 years)





1100 Points +38%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288


823 Points +3%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


800 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (n=1)





800 Points 0%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144


735 Points -8%

Creativity
Average of class Smartphone
  (163 – 1992, n=123, last 2 years)





1018 Points +57%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288


668 Points +3%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


648 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (n=1)





648 Points 0%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144


639 Points -1%

Responsiveness
Average of class Smartphone
  (239 – 13042, n=123, last 2 years)





2820 Points +206%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


922 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (n=1)





922 Points 0%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288


882 Points -4%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144


708 Points -23%

Jetstream 2 – 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (23.8 – 387, n=149, last 2 years)





156 Points +20%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288


132.67 Points +2%

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192


129.909 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  (n=1)





129.9 Points 0%

Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192


101.959 Points -22%

Honor Magic8 Lite Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Google Pixel 9a Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5

-66%

-37%

-33%

-15%

-3%

Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)

1948.54

1043.4

-46%

996.23

-49%

1688.82

-13%

Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)

1828.13

232.6

-87%

970.63

-47%

853.5

-53%

1338 575 – 2028, n=36)

-27%

Random Read 4KB (MB/s)

344.19

194.4

-44%

255.89

-26%

241.03

-30%

290 208 – 386, n=36)

-16%

Random Write 4KB (MB/s)

412.87

63.5

-85%

304.95

-26%

261.8

-37%

357 64.8 – 745, n=36)

-14%

  44.8 °C
113 F
40.7 °C
105 F
37 °C
99 F
 
  41 °C
106 F
40.7 °C
105 F
36.4 °C
98 F
 
  40 °C
104 F
38.1 °C
101 F
35.2 °C
95 F
 
Maximum: 44.8 °C = 113 F
Average: 39.3 °C = 103 F
35.6 °C
96 F
36.2 °C
97 F
40.2 °C
104 F
34 °C
93 F
37.2 °C
99 F
38.2 °C
101 F
33.7 °C
93 F
35.7 °C
96 F
37 °C
99 F
Maximum: 40.2 °C = 104 F
Average: 36.4 °C = 98 F

Room Temperature 20.6 °C = 69 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic8 Lite
Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


99.6 %

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3


99.5 % 0%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


97.3 % -2%

Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


54.5 % -45%

Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor Magic8 Lite
Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


99.5 %

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3


99 % -1%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash


98.7 % -1%

Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


58.4 % -41%

Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic8 Lite
Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


99.1 %

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3


99 % 0%

Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


84.5 % -15%

0510152025303540455055Tooltip

Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash: Ø22.8 (22.8-22.9)

Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash: Ø37 (30.1-55.2)

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.838.22529.629.23119.332.24025.336.15033.3386320.7388023.83710018.43812515.238.816011.952.8200155825011.758.531511.760.240010.161.55009.867.163010.870.280011.371.9100011.376.5125012.377.8160011.777.5200011.381.725001282.2315012.282.6400012.882.8500013.177.7630013.375.6800013.372.21000013.466.81250013.365.91600012.968.3SPL24.491.1N0.582.2median 12.2median 71.9Delta1.38.638.24632.536.421.931.831.429.333.538.921.730.72430.317.835.116.643.119.754.41952.117.559.716.260.816.562.412.368.112.371.31570.913.273.212.47611.675.713.377.91278.312.779.812.980.113.379.51380.113.18013.579.713.670.813.463.225.489.90.782.2median 13.3median 73.21.79.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 143) 23h 01min
Reviewed: Honor Magic8 Lite
Reviewed: Honor Magic8 Lite

The Honor Magic8 Lite is a robust mid-range smartphone featuring an extremely durable chassis, a bright 120-Hz OLED display, a large 7,500-mAh battery and a solid main camera. However, it makes compromises compared to the China model in areas such as Wi-Fi performance, speaker quality, the ultra-wide-angle camera and certain convenience features.

Honor Magic8 Lite
– 01/14/2026 v8

Daniel Schmidt

Connectivity

45 / 69 → 65%

Games Performance

16 / 55 → 29%

Application Performance

62 / 85 → 73%

Smartphone – Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
90%

Power Use
93.8%

Repairability
20%

Software Updates
100%

Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 54.8%

Image

Model / Review

Price

Weight

Drive

Display

1.

78%

Honor Magic8 Lite

Honor Magic8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $6.87
GUYAHANYER (3-Pack Designed …
2. $8.07
GUYAHANYER (4-Pack Designed …
3. $5.67
GUYAHANYER (2-Pack Designed …
List Price: 400€
189 g 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash 6.79″
2640×1200
427 PPI
OLED

2.

75.8%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $599.89
List Price: 609€
240 g 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash 6.60″
2408×1080
400 PPI
PLS

3.

79.6%

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘
12 GB Memory
Amazon:
1. $6.99
JETech Screen Protector for …
2. $11.99
Ibywind For Nothing Phone (3…
3. $4.99
Fhyeugfy for Nothing Phone (…
211 g 6.77″
2392×1080
388 PPI
AMOLED

4.

81%

Google Pixel 9a

Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $454.00
Google Pixel 9a with Gemini …
2. $6.74
Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design…
3. $5.99
Ferilinso 3 Pack Screen Prot…
List Price: 549€
185.9 g 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash 6.30″
2424×1080
421 PPI
pOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Daniel Schmidt, 2026-01-19 (Update: 2026-01-19)

Read More


Reader's opinions

Leave a Reply


Current track

Title

Artist